fran

Latest Comments
158 Comments

    • Tue Dec 2nd 14:52 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Long Term Fundamental Value of Stocks Smoother Than Prices
      no combustion[warmth] involved. all computer generated digits. many are but promises to guarantee funding. we'll not know all the truth[results] for several years. pick your poison--

      hyperinflation
      hyperdeflation
      three bears[just right]

      hope for the best.


      On Dec 01 06:00 PM sheople wrote:

      > Without going to (still wallowing in my ignorance) his website, I
      > would contend that never before has our nation faced such debt. During
      > the Great Depression, the dollar was still worth money. We could
      > very well be using the money that is being printed as I write this,
      > to burn to keep warm. I don't see that anywhere on the charts. Long
      > live the Federal Reserve.
      View article »
    • Tue Dec 2nd 14:20 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Focusing on Commodity ETFs: Hyperinflation Seems Inevitable
      track the CRB index[or any other long lived multi-commodity index of choice]vs inflation indicator or falling $ value indicator over recent history[25 to 50 yrs]. the answers to questions will be evident.


      On Dec 02 07:31 AM Jack K wrote:

      > Commodities make sense at the right time. But when is the right time?
      > There are any inflationary indicators. Which one is most associated
      > with a rise in commodity prices?
      > M1, M2, M3, gold, oil, food, dollar vs. Once they triple in price,
      > it is too late to buy them.
      > They all have gone up at one point, without significant inflation.
      >
      > What do you think, Keith?
      View article »
    • Mon Dec 1st 15:34 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Gold: The Next Reserve Currency Player
      good question. there are many who have done so for many years--even before and after the birthdate of GLD, et. al. must be reasons. good research project for you to identify all potential pro/con. start with web sites, 321gold, general "google", even SA site under CEF, GLD, SLV. maybe even an SA write-up afterwards.


      On Dec 01 03:33 AM Vancan wrote:

      > I have a second question: Why would anyone buy CEF which is selling
      > at a15% premium over its NAV, instead of buying GLD?
      View article »
    • Mon Dec 1st 15:13 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Gold: The Next Reserve Currency Player
      steve--

      always nice to find a positive/factual viewpoint among the clutter. thanks.


      On Nov 30 09:11 PM The hand wrote:

      > i would be happy if gold became a currency - or even a true reserve
      > currency. however, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain (or the rest of the GCC)
      > do not worry about what happens after oil as there are significant
      > mineral deposits also.
      >
      > arabs are traders and merchants. they will buy gold and silver when
      > they can - but they will be purchasing it privately so not to drive
      > the price up. they will do nothing to drive the value down of fiat
      > currencies.
      >
      View article »
    • Mon Dec 1st 15:02 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Gold: The Next Reserve Currency Player
      please help me understand how a holder of GLD shares can request/receive gold commodity. wouldn't a sale of GLD shares yield fiat currency?


      On Nov 30 09:37 AM relmor wrote:

      > Dont buy the GLD. Its an end game scam. When a rush of investors
      > ever demand there gold, they will be in for quite a surprise. Also
      > could crash any day because of that. Physical gold cant crash. Gold
      > stocks will outperform gold for a while anyway, as the charts are
      > dipicting.
      View article »
    • Mon Dec 1st 14:31 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bailouts: Unfair to Non-Bailees
      wouldn't your points be as valid and noteworthy without informing us of your tax status[pay $300K]?


      On Nov 30 08:18 PM John77 wrote:

      > As a taxpayer who pays about $300,000 per year to the U.S. Treasury,
      > I am furious about the actions of banks that have received MY money.
      >
      > Firstly, Goldman Sachs is planning a FDIC-insured euro debt issue.
      > If I am going to be insuring their debt issues, it better be to U.S.
      > interests! Furthermore, the banks are profiting from issuance of
      > FDIC-insured corporate bonds. If I am going to take on the FULL risks
      > of issuing these bonds, I want the FULL profit the interest brings.
      > The banks can keep the origination fees. Goldman is also in the bidding
      > for a stake in a German power grid project worth 1 billion Euros.
      > This is after Goldman got $10 billion of OUR money under the TARP.
      > Is that MY money going for this foreign infrastructure project?
      >
      > Secondly, Morgan Stanley just spent 200 million Chinese Yuan to buy
      > a 19.9% stake in a Chinese Trust Bank. I want to know, did MY capital
      > injection of $10 billion dollars into Morgan Stanley help pay for
      > this? If this bank is hurting for capital so much that it needs OUR
      > money, why is that money being spent to buy stakes in foreign banks?
      >
      > Finally, and perhaps most egregiously, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup,
      > and JP Morgan Chase are among banks now profiting from credit-recovery
      > swaps, which are bets on the amount investors may recover from bonds
      > after borrowers go bankrupt. Among the borrowers being bet against
      > is the ailing General Motors.
      > Why do we as taxpayers dole out TRILLIONS of OUR dollars to these
      > banks just so that they can increase THEIR profit margins? The automotive
      > industry is forced to undergo body cavity searches for a measly $25
      > billion, and we continue to dole out TRILLIONS to these banks with
      > no strings attached. DISGUSTING!!
      > John
      > American Taxpayer
      View article »
    • Mon Dec 1st 13:44 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Russia ETF Still Caught in a Tempest
      the russian circumstance sounds much like we may experience, should all our efforts with worthless dollar stuffing into the deflation void fail. will our efforts end in hyper-inflation or hype-deflation, or, if you believe in the three bears[no pun intended], "just right" ?
      View article »
    • Mon Dec 1st 13:25 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Real Problem? People Are Scared to Spend
      WOW--

      to the first two comments--

      COGNITIVE DISSONANCE??
      View article »
    • Sun Nov 30th 20:42 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      How Wall Street Has Failed the Individual Investor
      three truths in life--

      1-a house is a place to live[before and after caves]

      2-markets are unpredictable[since bartering began]

      3-change is inevitable


      our ancestors survived, so are we apt to do the same. the human spirit to struggle/survive/impro... has not changed.

      all of this history before newspapers, radio, tv, etc.

      WHO TOLD US HOW TO GET THIS FAR?
      View article »
    • Sun Nov 30th 19:24 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 -1
      Commented on:
      How Much Does the Bailout Really Cost?
      we can't know that which is not yet known. someday this type analysis can be performed with valid results. after we've stuffed enough worthless digital dollars into the the void created by an excessively infated[worthless] past economy. stay tuned. for how long i hazard no estimate. what are the odds that it's done correctly? what are the consequences with correct/incorrect stuffing? these are worthy subjects for discussion, as they will affect us greatly.


      On Nov 30 12:45 PM CaptainJJack wrote:

      > Axelrod608,
      >
      > I believe the $130 Trillion number is the total swap market notional
      > amount, which includes not only credit swaps but interest rate swaps
      > and other swaps.
      >
      > Since both sides of the swap are usually counted, and because many
      > of the larger swaps were divided among many counter parties, the
      > numbers you quote WAY overstates the true exposure.
      >
      > I seriously question whether there is a lot of unfunded exposure.
      > I am personally aware of swaps done where Lehman was the intermediary,
      > and as part of transaction, the counter party with losses had to
      > post collateral as losses mounted. The swaps were settled as specified
      > in the contracts even though Lehman was bankrupt.
      >
      > In fact, it was the collateral that took AIG down even though it
      > is not likely that AIG will ever actually have to pay out any losses
      > on many of the CDOs they wrote the credit default coverage on.<br/>
      >
      > So, until I see something otherwise, I do not believe that CDS market
      > is in the trouble you indicate. There certainly are losses, but the
      > losses are being funded and are likely to be paid as the contracts
      > specify.
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 28th 16:50 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Macquarie Infrastructure Trust: Use It Only as a Portfolio Diversifier
      interesting educational material. steve hansen has article in today's SA--re difficulties getting big infra to happen/be effective. basic lesson--understand the realm of one's investments and what's happening in the economic world. thanks
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 28th 16:21 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Investment Ideas for an Inflationary Environment
      JLOUNSBURY59--

      thank you. i had just read the two items by mr hansen in today's SA. i've added you both to "list".

      your response to CHRIS B was also very constructive to anyone with doubts/questions about "what's up in this dilemma". to some, your initial objective [para. 1-this article] is a success.
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 28th 14:06 PM
      |
      Rating: +1 0
      Commented on:
      Investment Ideas for an Inflationary Environment
      thanks for this very concise summary of what is currently taking place in the world economy--filling a paper void with worthless paper, hopeing we can guess properly on the size of the amounts involved. why can't the various pundits/talking heads be so clear?[could they not really understand? keep the public confused?]

      this is a global problem/action plan. beyond CRB, any other global indicators to watch?
      View article »
    • Mon Nov 24th 20:59 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      There Are Still Many Shoes Left to Drop
      THE_FEDS_CORRUPT--

      the question is not "where was the media"?

      the questions are--

      where were the gov't regulators and congressional oversights?

      where were the concerned/involved citizens?

      if your guardian is the media/press-- history is fraught with those deficiencies, biases, and bribes.

      in the end--"....we have met the enemy. it is us".


      signed: GERRY MANDER
      View article »
    • Tue Nov 18th 12:00 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Precious Metals Will Depose Cash from Its Temporary Throne
      i support mr. courtenay's comment.
      View article »