User 217769

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
comments3
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
3 Comments

    • Wed Jul 9th 09:52 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Blogonomics: Market Manipulation?
      So you say Jackson wrote you this?....

      "We love that we publish articles on the short side; they help investors to avoid potholes, generate real discussion of companies and their businesses, and are a fresh change from the bland rehashes of press releases that are too frequent in financial media."

      Apparently Jackson has a difficult time distinguishing between a legitimate short analysis and blatant lies. A legitimate short analysis provides real facts and figures to substantiate their opinion whereas an illegal fraud is one where lies are made up to manipulate the stock price. You and Jackson are evidently incapable of telling the difference so here is Webster's definition for you:

      Fraud:

      1 a: deceit, trickery; specifically : intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right b: an act of deceiving or misrepresenting : trick


      wire fraud:

      fraud committed using a means of electronic communication (as a telephone or computer)


      You go on to say:

      "If Mulcahy's post is factually incorrect, then all it does is put the stock on sale, and create a fabulous buying opportunity. On the other hand, if Mulcahy has a point, then they learn about the company and can adjust their analysis of it accordingly."

      Oh, really? This kind of fraud is used to drive the stock down making it much more difficult to raise capital for startup companies. The whole intent is so devalue a Company stock until it becomes worthless in order to maximize their short position. Long's will sleep better knowing their Company's stock is being illegally manipulated making it more difficult to raise capital. Right.

      When publishing BS like Mulcahy's you should remember the old saying..."You are intitled to your own opinions but NOT your own set of facts."
      View article »
    • Fri Jul 4th 12:54 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Microvision's No Show Hands the Pico Projector Market to TI
      It is very difficult to build an honorable reputation and once achieved it is destroyed so easily. Your printing of a litany of lies about Microvision by an admitted Short with a sleazy agenda destroyed whatever sense of fairness and honesty you had with me. Did you make a lot of money going short with the writer?...a little wink and nod prior to its publication? It is easy to see why so many young people today don't want to invest in stocks as they perceive the market to be manipulated by unethical people. Participating in a fraud as you did just lends credence to that belief.
      View article »
    • Fri Jun 27th 11:26 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Microvision's No Show Hands the Pico Projector Market to TI
      Have you been sued yet?
      View article »