Jon Smirl

comments24
  • Positive ratings +2
  • Negative ratings -1
  • Net rating +1 or 66 %
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
24 Comments

    • Tue Dec 2nd 08:04 AM
      |
      Rating: +1 0
      Commented on:
      A Little Known Fact, And Good News, About This Crisis
      Mortgage deductions were a tiny factor in this mess. What created this mess was allowing people to gamble with "Other People's Money". Buy a million dollar house for nothing down, flip it a year later for $1.2M. Profit $200K, risk zero. House goes to $800K instead, take a foreclosure. Live it for three years without making payments while you fight the foreclosure. You effectively made $200K. Nothing down and you made money in both directions, it was a great bet - you couldn't lose.

      Require 20% down, or 10% down with PMI and none of this would have happened.
      View article »
    • Tue Nov 25th 08:47 AM
      |
      Rating: +1 0
      Commented on:
      Ten Reasons to Hate Mortgage Modifications
      Nothing down == renter. If payments aren't being made then a quick foreclosure is no different than an eviction and eviction happens all of the time. Negotiate with the bank to not destroy your credit.

      If you can't make your payments then you bought more house than you could afford. Temporary assistance is not going to make the problem go away. Quick foreclosure will.
      View article »
    • Mon Nov 24th 09:36 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Calling for Fed Intervention in the Housing Market
      Direct intervention is a bureaucratic nightmare and ripe for massive corruption in who gets help and who doesn't. If the government wants to lower the supply of housing on the market it can do so more efficiently by lowing the cost of holding onto an existing house. Temporarily allowing the deduction of 150-200% of interest paid on an existing loan lowers the holding cost without renegotiating millions of loans. Lower holding costs will result in houses coming off the market while people wait for better prices.
      View article »
    • Wed Nov 19th 08:56 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Solve the Housing Crisis by Rewarding the Prudent
      A simpler way to implement this is to allow the tax deduction of 150-200% of mortgage interest paid, not accrued. That would achieve the same effect without needing to refinance everything. Limit the deduction to pre-existing loans on your primary residence.



      View article »
    • Sun Nov 9th 10:29 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Ten Reasons to Invest in Florida
      I suspect the water problems would go away in Florida if the massive federal subsidies for sugar were cut.
      View article »
    • Sun Nov 9th 07:43 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 -1
      Commented on:
      It Might Be Impossible to Stop the Decline of Housing Prices
      A simple short term fix would be to temporarily lower the cost of keeping a home. This could be done by allowing the tax deduction of double the amount of interest paid on an existing loan on your primary residence.

      The government knows how much interested is being paid and can calculate exactly what this would cost. Lower the multiplying factor each year until the excess inventory clears.

      This would be trivial to administer and it delivers the largest benefits to the people who need it the most; ones with large, high interest loans. It a lot of cases it would wipe out this group's federal tax liability completely.

      It would have cost a lot less than $700B and the banks would have been ok since everyone would have paid their mortgages. You only get the deduction for interest PAID not accrued.
      View article »
    • Fri Oct 31st 13:07 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      'Too Much House' Buyers To Be Rewarded?
      Best solution is quick, easy foreclosures. If you can't afford the house today you probably still won't be able to afford it ten years from now.

      Nothing or little down == renter.

      Why didn't I buy that $15M Florida ocean front mansion for nothing down? I could have gotten my loan adjusted into something that I can afford!
      View article »
    • Fri Oct 31st 11:02 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Economic Anomalies Explained
      It's Congress that spends the money, not the President. Congress routinely ignores the President's budget requests. It doesn't matter which party is in power, it is Congress spending the money.
      View article »
    • Tue Oct 28th 09:17 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      On Rescuing Homeowners Undergoing Foreclosure
      I agree, the way to fix the housing mess is to speed up the rate of foreclosures rather than slow it down. If someone has bought beyond their means how is short term government support going to help? As soon as the support ends they'll be back in trouble. These are 30 year mortgages and 30 year problems.

      Given the stat that 45% of homes under foreclosure are unoccupied makes me think that far more people in trouble are speculators than owners. I'm renting a second home in FL right now for thirty cents on the dollar of what it would cost me to buy and the price is falling 20% a year on it.
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 22nd 14:42 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Lease-Back Bailout
      "How can we help people who are genuinely having difficulty making their mortgage payments, without needlessly bailing out any old homeowner who'd simply like to pay less?"

      I'm having genuine trouble making payments on the $15M nothing down house I wish I had bought.

      If you can't make your payments you bought more house than you can afford. You are better off in the long run losing it.
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 8th 13:16 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Debate: McCain's Insane Mortgage Proposal
      Why should the government buy defaulted mortgages at 50% of face? I'll default on my CountryWide Alt-A tomorrow if that's the case. I'm sick of hearing hedge fund managers on CNBC saying they can't sell Alt-A's at 50 cents on the dollar. I called up and offered 75 cents on the dollar for my Alt-A and was told to get lost or pay 100%.

      If banks are so desperate for capital why won't they deal with the mortgage holders? The only way to get them to deal is to purposely send the loan into foreclosure.

      I am completely at a lost as to why anybody would sell at a loan at 30 cents on the dollar without first sending letters to the mortgage holders offering 30 day payoff deals at 50 cents first.
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 8th 09:28 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Debate: McCain's Insane Mortgage Proposal
      There are far simpler solutions that could be implemented instantly.

      For example allow the deduction of 200% of interest paid, not accrued.

      Forgiving people who put little down extremely punishes people who put a lot down and then lost their down payment. It is cruel to force people who have lost their entire down payment to subsidize people who put little down. Zero down == renter.

      Deducting 200% interest paid will keep people in their home who can afford it, but not help those who were never able to afford the house in the first place. I wish I'd bought a $15M house for nothing down! If you truly can't afford the home, the faster it forecloses the better off everyone is.

      200% deduction would only be for pre-existing loans and it would phase out in about five years.
      View article »
    • Sun Sep 7th 10:34 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Housing: Did We Learn Nothing from the Dotcom Bust?
      Another group that got hurt badly were people doing involuntary moves that put down a large down payment. Aren't about 7% of transactions involuntary due to relocation, divorce, etc? This group wasn't speculating and lost their down payments.

      It's insane that the government is helping the nothing down crowd who were effectively renting. I know a builder who cleared $4M by renting out his spec homes, keeping the rent and not paying the mortgage, who ultimately lost them to foreclosure. Of course he knew he was going to lose them all along and fought in court for as long as he could.
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 22nd 09:24 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      3 Stocks Hitting 5-Year Highs, Despite the Bear Market
      Sybase, SY, is hitting 15 year highs. It's mobile messaging is really doing well.
      View article »
    • Fri Jul 25th 14:26 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      NVIDIA's Long-Term Prospects Mean It's Currently Undervalued
      The GPU threats to Nvidia from Intel and AMD haven't shipped yet. They are a fundamental change in the way GPUs are constructed and are difficult for Nvidia to respond to. Intel/AMD are going to hurt Nvidia badly when these chips ship. Nvidia will probably be forced to respond by entering the x86 CPU market. Nvidia is at their peak revenue right now, the future is going to be much more difficult.

      A simplistic way to look at this is that we are switching from add-in graphics cards to GPUs that plug into CPU sockets. Intel and AMD control those sockets and they're making their own chips. Competing against bundled GPU/CPU SKUs from Intel/AMD is a tough nut to crack.

      This change is the reason why AMD bought ATI. Intel decided Nvidia was too expensive and designed the chips in-house. Nvidia is left without a partner.
      View article »