Alexander77

Comment Stream » POT

Comment Stream
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
  • A Look at 4 of George Soros' Stocks
    PBR will hold at these levels, let us watch for a break out around these levels
    Oct 22 12:29 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The Real Reasons Fertilizer Stocks Are In the Dirt
    I think the reasons are valid but however it was only a matter before the stars in AG would fall too, even gold stocks have declined. The crisis in the markets spread to AG unfortunately
    Oct 07 12:23 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Monday Options Update: POT, XLF, NCC, SOV, GD, AAPL, RIMM, C, BGG
    I feel like I am holland buying tullips that are worth nothing, I keep the faith in these stocks because the fundmentals are there but the invisible hand is going against every single asset class


    On Oct 02 09:08 PM einstein p fleet wrote:

    > Well, so far everyone ---- including me --- has POT and MOS wrong.
    >
    >
    > Personally, I think the credit crunch has a lot to do with it and
    > I worry that we will see ramifications in the form of food shortages
    > next year. People may have to tighten their belts a bit more than
    > expected.
    >
    > I've seen several comparisons to the dot com bubble which I find
    > difficult to understand. POT and MOS trade at low PE ratios, especially
    > going forward, throw off a ton of cash, and have a viable business
    > model. A lot of other basic material and infrastructure stocks seem
    > to be in the same position. How would you compare that to JDSU or
    > the other dot com busts that traded at insane multiples and did little
    > or no business to speak of? MOS may have missed earnings, but they
    > still made over 1.3B, trade and trade at less than 3X estimated 2009
    > earnings. What am I missing here?
    >
    Oct 03 01:30 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Potash Corp. Update: Time To Buy?
    The slide in crop prices should a temporary event, pot is still a very solid investment
    Sep 14 13:00 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • POT
    TRA is better play, John. TNH is working at full capicity and the only variant is pricing. It is a never a good thing when a stock is too dependant on pricing. As a matter of fact my rule is never depend on one single factor because they always disappoint you.
    Sep 04 12:49 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View forum topic
  • Potash Corp. Earnings Shouldn't Peak Until at Least 2011
    The mutual fund close helped, bring commodities down. Very few people can bring POT down forty percent down, that is bull!
    Sep 03 23:03 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • What's in Store for the Fertilizer Industry?
    Great article, u got it right!
    Sep 03 16:09 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Potash Corp. Earnings Shouldn't Peak Until at Least 2011
    I think the place for you is Russia !! We are in the USA my friend we can say whatever we want!!, go take your anger somewhere else my friend. You probably got dumped !! but get a bottle a celebrate it happens to all of us buddy


    On Aug 31 12:12 PM Thought-Abou t-It wrote:

    > Well said. DITTO !
    > ______________________...
    Sep 01 16:26 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The Agriculture Boom Goes Bust
    100% percent right, I think stocks with inelastic demand in what we need in these kind of markets



    On Jul 22 10:02 PM Rocknrollleg end193 wrote:

    > Look at what you wrote here, Andrew:
    >
    > "It’s simple economics. Fertilizer prices are not inelastic. High
    > prices are reducing total fertilizer use around the world. We could
    > see a big impact on reduced consumption when the Q2 numbers come
    > out in the next few days."
    >
    > Wrong. Fertilizer prices ARE relatively inelastic. As long as there's
    > a strong demand for food, farmers are gonna try and grow it. In fact,
    > the precise reason for the recent spike in fertilizer prices is BECAUSE
    > of the ever-increasing world food demand. There's a pretty direct
    > correlation between fertilizer prices and food prices, because as
    > DeltaXray7 wisely said, "If farmers want good yields per acre then
    > they have to fertilze [sic]."
    Jul 23 10:34 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • The Agriculture Boom Goes Bust
    I bought AGU I think it is a steal with its excellent earnings and prospects. The market has not fully valued this stock


    On Jul 23 08:40 AM andyn wrote:

    > Even with all these stock increases, forward P/E for AGU remains
    > around 11... and remember they have already pre-announced an increase
    > in earnings and the Indian/Chinese contracts are up for re-negotiation.
    > This stock might explode to the upside if they guide further higher.
    > Already the stock has retraced back from 110 to 95. Buy now and hang
    > on atleast until end of the year.
    Jul 23 10:31 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • UBS Raises PotashCorp and Agrium's Price Targets - Again
    Great article,very well though out points on the bear market and how POT and AGU have very strong fundamentals for years to come!!
    Jul 21 00:54 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
  • Canaccord Adams Bullish on Fertilizer Companies
    Agriculture is the way to go,last few weeks are proof of that!!


    On Jul 10 04:30 PM User 223471 wrote:

    > PLEAS REFER TO ANOTHER GEAT Ag STOCK: ICL.TA (some places known as:ichem.TA)
    Jul 13 10:35 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article

Alexander77's Comments Stream Stats

  • 37 Comments, 0 , 0
  • Total Comment Stream rating - = 0