• Font Size:
  • Print

As oil prices continue soaring and consumers’ preference shifts to smaller and more fuel efficient vehicles, we are likely to see a proliferation of hybrid technology. Looking at the most recent car sales data in the US, Honda (HMC) and Hyundai out-sold both GM (GM) and Ford (F), mostly due to their wide selection of smaller more fuel efficient vehicles.

So what does this have to do with batteries? I believe quite a lot... It would appear the next natural progression in the auto industry will be the development and sale of plug-in hybrids [PHEV]. Thus far, production of PHEVs has been extremely limited, mostly due to battery related issues. However, given the current record oil prices and recent advancements in battery technology it is likely this market will show significant growth over the next several years.

Currently, both GM  and Toyota (TM) are hoping to release PHEVs by 2010. While Ford’s current plan is to release PEHVs sometime between 2012 and 2020. However, Ford’s senior energy storage manager was recently quoted saying:

If there's going to be a true plug-in hybrid market, we're going to be there. It's just that that's a huge commitment to actually go to production.

Which indicates to me that for the time being Ford will be sitting on the side-line. Coincidentally, Ford’s June sales decreased by 28%, mostly due to their lack of fuel-efficient cars and trucks relative to some of their peers.

The proliferation of hybrids & PHEVs would place large demands on the battery industry, which could provide investors with good investment opportunities within the sector. However, I personally know very little about the players in the global battery industry, so I decided to give myself a quick primer. According to Bloomberg’s industry classification system, globally the batteries & battery systems sector has 105 members.

With this in mind, I decided to create a global market-cap weighted index to track the overall performance of the sector. Out of the 105 companies my index ended up containing 71 members, I factored out companies with bad data and Energizer. I factored out Energizer because of their large market cap, and since as far as I know they are not developing any automotive related battery products. The average market cap of the index totaled USD225.38mn, with BYD co Ltd of China (1211 HK Equity) having the highest market cap of USD2.6bn (16.4% of index). See the chart below for more details.

click to enlarge images

Index Components with Weighting

Source: Bloomberg

I now wanted to compare the performance of the index against the S&P500 and WTI prices. To do this, I used daily prices and rebased all the prices to 100 on 8/2/2007 (see charts below):

The Global Battery Index has Outperformed the S&P500

Source: Bloomberg

The Global Battery Index has a Positive Correlation with WTI Prices

Source: Bloomberg

As you can see from the charts above, the global battery index easily out-performed the S&P500 and shows a strong positive correlation to WTI prices. This implies that if energy prices continue to rise or remain elevated, we could continue to see the battery outperform the S&P500 as battery related demand increases.

Once this was complete, I geographically broke out the companies. 20 of the 71 companies in the index are located within the US, followed by China with 9, South Korea with 8, and India with 6 (see chart below for more details):

The Top 5 Countries make up 83% of the Market Cap

Source: Bloomberg

As you can see from the chart above, China, the US, Japan, India, and Taiwan together make-up roughly 83% of the total market cap, while containing 58% of the total companies. To further assist this analysis, I created country specific indices to compare against the benchmark; at first I found the results surprising.

Chinese Battery Index

American Battery Index

Japanese Battery Index

Indian Battery Index

Taiwanese Battery Index

*Source: Bloomberg for all charts

Relative to the overall battery index, it is clear that Japan was a significant out-performer. This I believe can partially be explained by the fact that Japan imports nearly 100% of its oil, which among other factors, has led the government to announce oil and gas suppliers will be required to increase the use of renewable energy resources. The government's pro-active approach coupled by the fact that Japanese automakers, such as Honda and Toyota, seem to be on the forefront of hybrid technology should continue to bolster Japanese demand for battery related products. The three Japanese companies included in the index are GS Yuasa Corp, NPC Inc, & Shin-Kobe Electric Machinery Co. Mitsubishi Motors setup a joint venture with GS Yuasa corporation in Dec. 2007 to provide lithium-ion batteries starting in April 2009. According to Bloomberg, Shin-Kobe was recently rated a buy from Nomura Holdings Inc. who cited an increasing demand for batteries.

Will the other countries within the index follow suit? I believe so, but further analysis would be needed to isolate specific equities best positioned to take advantage of the potential increase in demand, and I am not in the habit of recommending specific equities on this blog. The bottom line is, as long as oil prices remain elevated we should continue to see increased demand for battery related products as automakers begin moving towards more hybrid and PHEV technology.

Disclosure: none

Tom Malthus

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 8 comments:

  •  
    Jul 03 09:05 AM
    You may want to include ultra and super capacitor companies in the index. they are small now but will have an important role to play in the future, due to the ability to rapidly cycle and support multiple deep discharges. The materials science of energy density is making great strides.
  •  
    Jul 03 09:06 AM
    i looked for johnson controls in your list but didn't see it.
    > jack
  •  
    Jul 03 09:28 AM
    Jack, for whatever reason JCI isn't listed under BBergs Batteries/Battery Systems classification. It could be because of their diversified product base and would probably fall under the auto parts classification.
  •  
    Jul 03 09:46 AM
    Great Analysis. However, I would add LG Chem from S Korea and Continental from Germany because those are two of the publicly traded companies that are known to be in the running to supply batteries to GM for its upcoming entry.
  •  
    Jul 03 01:29 PM
    You definitely want EnerDel (HEV) in there.
  •  
    Jul 03 01:37 PM
    Don't see EnerDel HEV or Cobasys a jv with ENER.
  •  
    Jul 04 01:30 AM
    End of 2009, 2010-2012...great with oil at $200.

    How will people afford them? Can't sell an SUV or minivan for anything reasonable currently. Home Equity? Credit Card? Savings? Even with Tax credits, I can not see the ability of the Public to buy them on a massive enough basis to put a dent into oil usage.

    How about a sidecar on a Harley?
  •  
    Jul 22 01:02 PM
    Another area to look at, concerns companies that supply essential components to battery makers. These guys could be the ones who make the real money. One should also not overlook the other components essential to hybrid and all electric vehicles, which include makers of electric motors, chargers, capacitors, etc. How about lithium and copper miners and distributors?!

ETFs In Focus